※ 引述《LibertyBell (May it be.....)》之銘言:
: http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2006/eq_061226_wtai/neic_wtai_hrv.html
: http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2006/eq_061226_wtai/neic_wtai_q.html
: USGS 和 Harvard 的解很明顯的都是正斷層
: 隱沒帶正斷層地震?
: 第二個餘震解出來好像是走向滑移為主有正斷層分量
: 這個位置有什麼造成正斷層的可能因素?
Some secondary structures..
I think the Chaochou Fault is one of the possibilities, since the southern
part of this fault alreay presents the normal fault feature on the surface
However, these earthquakes locate in the west of the fault, we need more
evidences to know where is the source.
--
: http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2006/eq_061226_wtai/neic_wtai_hrv.html
: http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2006/eq_061226_wtai/neic_wtai_q.html
: USGS 和 Harvard 的解很明顯的都是正斷層
: 隱沒帶正斷層地震?
: 第二個餘震解出來好像是走向滑移為主有正斷層分量
: 這個位置有什麼造成正斷層的可能因素?
Some secondary structures..
I think the Chaochou Fault is one of the possibilities, since the southern
part of this fault alreay presents the normal fault feature on the surface
However, these earthquakes locate in the west of the fault, we need more
evidences to know where is the source.
--
All Comments