: → phragmite :早上聽到一則新聞，可是找不到文字版。發言人是前朝 09/27 10:36
: → phragmite :署長涂醒哲，那句話的大意好像是說政府把分析限值與 09/27 10:39
: → phragmite :許可值混在一起，變成讓分析限值牽著走……呃，大概 09/27 10:40
: → phragmite :是這樣。聽到這句話心裏的OS：難得有個腦袋清楚的人! 09/27 10:41
: → phragmite :不知道有沒有人可以幫我找文字版的，先謝過。 09/27 10:42
昨天看到紐西蘭食品衛生局公佈的5ppm,看不太懂,意思好像跟台灣衛生署差不多,
因為產品包裝可能釋出的風險,而根據根據歐盟公佈的TDI值去訂定,
而為何定各5ppm?超過5ppm才會採取行動,那等於許可值和之前衛生署說的好像沒有衝突
只是台灣解釋用2.5ppm 作為分析極限,並當成許可值,而引起反彈?
http://0rz.tw/f24NT
“Since the identification of the problems in China, food safety authorities
all around the world have been working to identify public health threshold
levels for melamine. We know that the presence of this chemical is part and
parcel of our life today, apparently leaching from plastics and contact
materials during processing and packaging in trace quantities. We also know
that at low levels it causes us no harm. Determining just how high levels
have to be before there is a risk is something we are all struggling with,”
says Dr Geoff Allen, NZFSA Director (Compliance & Investigation).
NZFSA has been in close contact with authorities in Australia, Canada, Europe
and the United States and elsewhere since the issue with melamine
adulteration in China became known.
“Over the past week, our scientists have been exchanging information with
their international colleagues. Last night, the European Food Safety
Authority updated its opinion on the estimated tolerable daily intake (TDI)
of melamine and left it unchanged at 0.5 mg/kg bodyweight (ie, for every kg a
person weighs they can safely consume 0.5 mg every day – for a 20 kg child
this is 10 mg; for a 70 kg adult the safe amount is 35 mg).”
Based on this figure, which is very close to but lower than that of the
United States, NZFSA has adopted a conservative threshold of 5 ppm for most
foods. This means that it has been considered that foods containing up to 5
ppm of melamine do not pose a risk to human health. However for starter
infant formula, this level will be set to the current level of test detection
of 1 ppm.
--
: → phragmite :署長涂醒哲，那句話的大意好像是說政府把分析限值與 09/27 10:39
: → phragmite :許可值混在一起，變成讓分析限值牽著走……呃，大概 09/27 10:40
: → phragmite :是這樣。聽到這句話心裏的OS：難得有個腦袋清楚的人! 09/27 10:41
: → phragmite :不知道有沒有人可以幫我找文字版的，先謝過。 09/27 10:42
昨天看到紐西蘭食品衛生局公佈的5ppm,看不太懂,意思好像跟台灣衛生署差不多,
因為產品包裝可能釋出的風險,而根據根據歐盟公佈的TDI值去訂定,
而為何定各5ppm?超過5ppm才會採取行動,那等於許可值和之前衛生署說的好像沒有衝突
只是台灣解釋用2.5ppm 作為分析極限,並當成許可值,而引起反彈?
http://0rz.tw/f24NT
“Since the identification of the problems in China, food safety authorities
all around the world have been working to identify public health threshold
levels for melamine. We know that the presence of this chemical is part and
parcel of our life today, apparently leaching from plastics and contact
materials during processing and packaging in trace quantities. We also know
that at low levels it causes us no harm. Determining just how high levels
have to be before there is a risk is something we are all struggling with,”
says Dr Geoff Allen, NZFSA Director (Compliance & Investigation).
NZFSA has been in close contact with authorities in Australia, Canada, Europe
and the United States and elsewhere since the issue with melamine
adulteration in China became known.
“Over the past week, our scientists have been exchanging information with
their international colleagues. Last night, the European Food Safety
Authority updated its opinion on the estimated tolerable daily intake (TDI)
of melamine and left it unchanged at 0.5 mg/kg bodyweight (ie, for every kg a
person weighs they can safely consume 0.5 mg every day – for a 20 kg child
this is 10 mg; for a 70 kg adult the safe amount is 35 mg).”
Based on this figure, which is very close to but lower than that of the
United States, NZFSA has adopted a conservative threshold of 5 ppm for most
foods. This means that it has been considered that foods containing up to 5
ppm of melamine do not pose a risk to human health. However for starter
infant formula, this level will be set to the current level of test detection
of 1 ppm.
--
All Comments