“Despite this constant exchange of populations across this permeable membrane, there is an extraordinarily stable, durable civilization discourse about hill and valley that treat each of these peoples as essentially different; one cultures, the other barbaric, one refined, the other primitive, one advanced and cosmopolitan and the other backward and parochial. These pairs, of course, are the pairs as valley elites see them. If we adopt the hill perspective we get different pairs; one is free and autonomous, the other is in bondage and subordination; one is nominally and equal of others, the other is socially inferior; one is physically mobile, the other is hemmed in by officials and state institutions” (2000: 3).
These two spheres remained intact in spite of the constant flow of people between them throughout history. “Hill tribes” and “valley civilization” according to Scott constitutes a “lived essentialism” that “remains intact as a powerful organizer of peoples’ lives and thoughts” (2000: 4).
“Despite this constant exchange of populations across this permeable membrane, there is an extraordinarily stable, durable civilization discourse about hill and valley that treat each of these peoples as essentially different; one cultures, the other barbaric, one refined, the other primitive, one advanced and cosmopolitan and the other backward and parochial. These pairs, of course, are the pairs as valley elites see them. If we adopt the hill perspective we get different pairs; one is free and autonomous, the other is in bondage and subordination; one is nominally and equal of others, the other is socially inferior; one is physically mobile, the other is hemmed in by officials and state institutions” (2000: 3).
已更新項目:
第三段重複了,不用翻,改翻
These two spheres remained intact in spite of the constant flow of people between them throughout history. “Hill tribes” and “valley civilization” according to Scott constitutes a “lived essentialism” that “remains intact as a powerful organizer of peoples’ lives and thoughts” (2000: 4).
“Despite this constant exchange of populations across this permeable membrane, there is an extraordinarily stable, durable civilization discourse about hill and valley that treat each of these peoples as essentially different; one cultures, the other barbaric, one refined, the other primitive, one advanced and cosmopolitan and the other backward and parochial. These pairs, of course, are the pairs as valley elites see them. If we adopt the hill perspective we get different pairs; one is free and autonomous, the other is in bondage and subordination; one is nominally and equal of others, the other is socially inferior; one is physically mobile, the other is hemmed in by officials and state institutions” (2000: 3).
已更新項目:
第三段重複了,不用翻,改翻
All Comments
2007-10-30 10:43:26 補充:
這兩球形歷史上原封保留了竟管人恆定的流程在他們之間。"小山部落" 和"谷文明" 根據史考特構成"保留原封作為人的生活和想法一個強有力的組織者" 的"居住的essentialism" (2000年: 4)