請幫我翻一篇有關TheNationalSea的文章2 - 社會議題

Table of Contents

As of early2005,the number of councils participating in the task force had increased to more than 70.It’s increased visibility, however, has been mainly the result of several controversial proposals, including a 50 per cent’ sustainability surcharge to be levied on the rates bills of absentee-owned holiday homes to mitigate their environmental, economic and social impacts(Millar 2005).For similar purposes, councils in the shires where Kangaroo Island and the Great Ocean Road are located have suggested the introduction of bridge and road tolls, while the Shire of Byron Bay (New South Wales) has gone further by proposing that the town be declared a national park accessible only by entry fees. Other revenue-generating ideas include the imposition of an offsetting levy on all inbound tourists, and a’ shadow tolling’ program where state governments pay a GST-generated fee to local councils based on how many domestic tourists they accommodate (Dick 2005).While each of the above proposals is likely to be met with enormous resistance from those who will be financially affected, the task force has succeeded in placing the sea change phenomenon on the national agenda while providing a structure to both propose and lobby for innovations that will hopefully lead to a more sustainable tourism sector on the Australian coastline.
已更新項目:
如果可以這篇英文也請大家幫忙!
http://tw.knowledge.yahoo.com/question/?qid=120611...

All Comments

Cara avatarCara2006-11-27
2005年初期海岸風貌變遷委員會成立工作小組的總數已超過70個。雖然工作小組的能見度增加了,但它卻主要是由幾個爭議性提案刺激下的產物,其中包括對沒有人居住的渡假屋開徵50﹪的附加稅,以緩和其對環境、經濟及社會的破壞(Millar 2005)。基於類似考量,在Kangaroo Island及Great Ocean Road的委員會,打算徵收橋樑與道路通行費,位於新南威爾斯的Byron Bay 郡更提議宣佈該地為國家公園然後收取門票。其他生財之道還包括,對國內遊客收取補償稅、要求政府依該地吸引多少國內遊客發給諮詢商品及服務稅(Dick 2005)。由於上述提議都與政府財政與個人荷包有關,所以遇到的阻力很大。然而工作小組透過提案及遊說,已將海岸風貌變遷提升至國家議題,從而為澳洲海岸觀光業創造更能永續發展的未來。.
Caroline avatarCaroline2006-11-24
手機刪除line照片不見真的難過
這家案例夠多,手機記憶體內外都可以,也沒限什麼牌子三星,HTC,SONY都可以,不過要等的比較久才知道原來要分析不是換零件哪麼簡單,心急吃不了熱豆腐,http://www.datahelp.com.tw/
htt[://www.data1.com.tw
Christine avatarChristine2006-11-23
當early2005時, 但是,增加能見度,參加特派組的委員會的數量已經增加到超過70.It  s, 主要是幾個引起爭論的提議的結果, 扣押缺席者擁有的假期家的比率賬單減輕他們環境,包括每cent  持續附加費一50, 經濟和社會影響(米勒2005)。 為相似的目的, 委員會在大袋鼠島和道路找到的巨大海洋已經建議橋和過路費的介紹在那裡的郡內, 拜倫吠(新南威爾士)的郡透過提議鎮宣佈一個國家公園可達到只以門票再進一步當時。 其他產生收入的想法包括徵收補償扣押全部回航的遊客, 並且他們容納多少國內遊客的州政府支付一銷售稅產生費給基于的地方的委員會在那裡的a  影子tolling  計畫(狄克2005)。 當每個上述提議很可能被遇到時來自將被在財政上影響的那些人的巨大的抵抗, 特派組成功安置海兌換關於國家議程的現象, 在提供一個架構提議和游說將在澳洲海岸線上充滿希望導致一個更可持續的旅遊部門的革新時。